Return-Path: <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net [77.88.29.152])
by forward6p.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 343F32145E
for <virginiahhart@gmail.com>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:23:23 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id DERxqqNQ
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:55 +0300
Received: from smtp.vgreports.com (smtp.vgreports.com [65.19.134.171])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id MGfgMU698n-Mp8GBgwB;
Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:51 +0300
Authentication-Results: mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net: domain of vgreports.com designates 65.19.134.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=peter.turay@vgreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@vgreports.com
X-SmarterMail-Authenticated-As: admin@vgreports.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h=received:from:to:message-id:subject:date:mime-version:reply-to
:content-type;
b=QXnN+iZTGWggKpDSF1VNSRB7ISEinRvXOXiSGPea1vf7eZODXPCQWqJK4vWfv0lOo
z0D2a7pysneWt42lZMrww+Xl3Lqn6mH6rEYMBqdMZabgUPvG0LG3uEukd8Udaog9h
WeFhSSRUXwru+JoFofUhwmv5Hi8jFDBWD9i9mu4f0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h= content-type:reply-to:mime-version:date:subject:message-id:to:from;
bh=Lq8D5EY7Zl0OVdt9LSyvi8F+45GBR3OKt23Xmt8YJW4=;
b=VPLcCcP8Tx+DlvIzJovSKKks/Lob7PugASwbVlkzrnSo2d8p/4D5bY+QHds5STuJA
oMFBgeha0ZNR0BXjfytExpdzv4NXqBENwxQr+4WzyKQGrC+CP9eb9x4DqiaeRtZt9
b1AJYWdspFZp2FdbnG8lcMlmF9IqVim/MUjBagL2I=
Received: from WIN-31JU0TAIRNS (WIN-31JU0TAIRNS [184.105.154.119]) by smtp.vgreports.com with SMTP;
Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
From: Peter Turay<peter.turay@vgreports.com>
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Message-Id: <20160526150103.1084433672@vgreports.com>
Subject: Report - Enterprise Endpoint Cyber Security Market Report 2015-2020
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: peter.turay@vgreports.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="AlternativeBoundary.22222222.22222222"
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<virginiahhart@gmail.com>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.71.27] said:
550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please
try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or
550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6596 rk7si13423051lbb.48 - gsmtp (in
reply to RCPT TO command)
четверг, 26 мая 2016 г.
Недоставленное сообщение
Return-Path: <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net [77.88.29.152])
by forward6p.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 272E121A36
for <bugmenot@asdasd.ru>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:23:31 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id DERxqqNQ
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:55 +0300
Received: from smtp.vgreports.com (smtp.vgreports.com [65.19.134.171])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id MGfgMU698n-Mp8GBgwB;
Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:51 +0300
Authentication-Results: mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net: domain of vgreports.com designates 65.19.134.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=peter.turay@vgreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@vgreports.com
X-SmarterMail-Authenticated-As: admin@vgreports.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h=received:from:to:message-id:subject:date:mime-version:reply-to
:content-type;
b=QXnN+iZTGWggKpDSF1VNSRB7ISEinRvXOXiSGPea1vf7eZODXPCQWqJK4vWfv0lOo
z0D2a7pysneWt42lZMrww+Xl3Lqn6mH6rEYMBqdMZabgUPvG0LG3uEukd8Udaog9h
WeFhSSRUXwru+JoFofUhwmv5Hi8jFDBWD9i9mu4f0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h= content-type:reply-to:mime-version:date:subject:message-id:to:from;
bh=Lq8D5EY7Zl0OVdt9LSyvi8F+45GBR3OKt23Xmt8YJW4=;
b=VPLcCcP8Tx+DlvIzJovSKKks/Lob7PugASwbVlkzrnSo2d8p/4D5bY+QHds5STuJA
oMFBgeha0ZNR0BXjfytExpdzv4NXqBENwxQr+4WzyKQGrC+CP9eb9x4DqiaeRtZt9
b1AJYWdspFZp2FdbnG8lcMlmF9IqVim/MUjBagL2I=
Received: from WIN-31JU0TAIRNS (WIN-31JU0TAIRNS [184.105.154.119]) by smtp.vgreports.com with SMTP;
Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
From: Peter Turay<peter.turay@vgreports.com>
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Message-Id: <20160526150103.1084433672@vgreports.com>
Subject: Report - Enterprise Endpoint Cyber Security Market Report 2015-2020
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: peter.turay@vgreports.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="AlternativeBoundary.22222222.22222222"
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<bugmenot@asdasd.ru>: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=asdasd.ru type=AAAA: Host not found
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net [77.88.29.152])
by forward6p.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 272E121A36
for <bugmenot@asdasd.ru>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:23:31 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id DERxqqNQ
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:55 +0300
Received: from smtp.vgreports.com (smtp.vgreports.com [65.19.134.171])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id MGfgMU698n-Mp8GBgwB;
Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:51 +0300
Authentication-Results: mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net: domain of vgreports.com designates 65.19.134.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=peter.turay@vgreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@vgreports.com
X-SmarterMail-Authenticated-As: admin@vgreports.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h=received:from:to:message-id:subject:date:mime-version:reply-to
:content-type;
b=QXnN+iZTGWggKpDSF1VNSRB7ISEinRvXOXiSGPea1vf7eZODXPCQWqJK4vWfv0lOo
z0D2a7pysneWt42lZMrww+Xl3Lqn6mH6rEYMBqdMZabgUPvG0LG3uEukd8Udaog9h
WeFhSSRUXwru+JoFofUhwmv5Hi8jFDBWD9i9mu4f0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h= content-type:reply-to:mime-version:date:subject:message-id:to:from;
bh=Lq8D5EY7Zl0OVdt9LSyvi8F+45GBR3OKt23Xmt8YJW4=;
b=VPLcCcP8Tx+DlvIzJovSKKks/Lob7PugASwbVlkzrnSo2d8p/4D5bY+QHds5STuJA
oMFBgeha0ZNR0BXjfytExpdzv4NXqBENwxQr+4WzyKQGrC+CP9eb9x4DqiaeRtZt9
b1AJYWdspFZp2FdbnG8lcMlmF9IqVim/MUjBagL2I=
Received: from WIN-31JU0TAIRNS (WIN-31JU0TAIRNS [184.105.154.119]) by smtp.vgreports.com with SMTP;
Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
From: Peter Turay<peter.turay@vgreports.com>
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Message-Id: <20160526150103.1084433672@vgreports.com>
Subject: Report - Enterprise Endpoint Cyber Security Market Report 2015-2020
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: peter.turay@vgreports.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="AlternativeBoundary.22222222.22222222"
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<bugmenot@asdasd.ru>: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=asdasd.ru type=AAAA: Host not found
Недоставленное сообщение
Return-Path: <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net [77.88.29.152])
by forward8p.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id BDF43213B3
for <raybpayne@gmail.com>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:23:22 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id DERxqqNQ
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:55 +0300
Received: from smtp.vgreports.com (smtp.vgreports.com [65.19.134.171])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id MGfgMU698n-Mp8GBgwB;
Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:51 +0300
Authentication-Results: mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net: domain of vgreports.com designates 65.19.134.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=peter.turay@vgreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@vgreports.com
X-SmarterMail-Authenticated-As: admin@vgreports.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h=received:from:to:message-id:subject:date:mime-version:reply-to
:content-type;
b=QXnN+iZTGWggKpDSF1VNSRB7ISEinRvXOXiSGPea1vf7eZODXPCQWqJK4vWfv0lOo
z0D2a7pysneWt42lZMrww+Xl3Lqn6mH6rEYMBqdMZabgUPvG0LG3uEukd8Udaog9h
WeFhSSRUXwru+JoFofUhwmv5Hi8jFDBWD9i9mu4f0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h= content-type:reply-to:mime-version:date:subject:message-id:to:from;
bh=Lq8D5EY7Zl0OVdt9LSyvi8F+45GBR3OKt23Xmt8YJW4=;
b=VPLcCcP8Tx+DlvIzJovSKKks/Lob7PugASwbVlkzrnSo2d8p/4D5bY+QHds5STuJA
oMFBgeha0ZNR0BXjfytExpdzv4NXqBENwxQr+4WzyKQGrC+CP9eb9x4DqiaeRtZt9
b1AJYWdspFZp2FdbnG8lcMlmF9IqVim/MUjBagL2I=
Received: from WIN-31JU0TAIRNS (WIN-31JU0TAIRNS [184.105.154.119]) by smtp.vgreports.com with SMTP;
Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
From: Peter Turay<peter.turay@vgreports.com>
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Message-Id: <20160526150103.1084433672@vgreports.com>
Subject: Report - Enterprise Endpoint Cyber Security Market Report 2015-2020
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: peter.turay@vgreports.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="AlternativeBoundary.22222222.22222222"
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<raybpayne@gmail.com>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2a00:1450:4010:c0b::1b]
said: 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist.
Please try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for
typos or 550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6596 s4si1949343lbo.117 - gsmtp (in
reply to RCPT TO command)
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net [77.88.29.152])
by forward8p.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id BDF43213B3
for <raybpayne@gmail.com>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:23:22 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id DERxqqNQ
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:55 +0300
Received: from smtp.vgreports.com (smtp.vgreports.com [65.19.134.171])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id MGfgMU698n-Mp8GBgwB;
Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:51 +0300
Authentication-Results: mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net: domain of vgreports.com designates 65.19.134.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=peter.turay@vgreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@vgreports.com
X-SmarterMail-Authenticated-As: admin@vgreports.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h=received:from:to:message-id:subject:date:mime-version:reply-to
:content-type;
b=QXnN+iZTGWggKpDSF1VNSRB7ISEinRvXOXiSGPea1vf7eZODXPCQWqJK4vWfv0lOo
z0D2a7pysneWt42lZMrww+Xl3Lqn6mH6rEYMBqdMZabgUPvG0LG3uEukd8Udaog9h
WeFhSSRUXwru+JoFofUhwmv5Hi8jFDBWD9i9mu4f0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h= content-type:reply-to:mime-version:date:subject:message-id:to:from;
bh=Lq8D5EY7Zl0OVdt9LSyvi8F+45GBR3OKt23Xmt8YJW4=;
b=VPLcCcP8Tx+DlvIzJovSKKks/Lob7PugASwbVlkzrnSo2d8p/4D5bY+QHds5STuJA
oMFBgeha0ZNR0BXjfytExpdzv4NXqBENwxQr+4WzyKQGrC+CP9eb9x4DqiaeRtZt9
b1AJYWdspFZp2FdbnG8lcMlmF9IqVim/MUjBagL2I=
Received: from WIN-31JU0TAIRNS (WIN-31JU0TAIRNS [184.105.154.119]) by smtp.vgreports.com with SMTP;
Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
From: Peter Turay<peter.turay@vgreports.com>
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Message-Id: <20160526150103.1084433672@vgreports.com>
Subject: Report - Enterprise Endpoint Cyber Security Market Report 2015-2020
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: peter.turay@vgreports.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="AlternativeBoundary.22222222.22222222"
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<raybpayne@gmail.com>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2a00:1450:4010:c0b::1b]
said: 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist.
Please try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for
typos or 550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6596 s4si1949343lbo.117 - gsmtp (in
reply to RCPT TO command)
Недоставленное сообщение
Return-Path: <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net [77.88.29.152])
by forward11p.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6255E20EA2
for <zhorazhorashvili@mail.ru>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:59 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id DERxqqNQ
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:55 +0300
Received: from smtp.vgreports.com (smtp.vgreports.com [65.19.134.171])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id MGfgMU698n-Mp8GBgwB;
Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:51 +0300
Authentication-Results: mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net: domain of vgreports.com designates 65.19.134.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=peter.turay@vgreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@vgreports.com
X-SmarterMail-Authenticated-As: admin@vgreports.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h=received:from:to:message-id:subject:date:mime-version:reply-to
:content-type;
b=QXnN+iZTGWggKpDSF1VNSRB7ISEinRvXOXiSGPea1vf7eZODXPCQWqJK4vWfv0lOo
z0D2a7pysneWt42lZMrww+Xl3Lqn6mH6rEYMBqdMZabgUPvG0LG3uEukd8Udaog9h
WeFhSSRUXwru+JoFofUhwmv5Hi8jFDBWD9i9mu4f0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h= content-type:reply-to:mime-version:date:subject:message-id:to:from;
bh=Lq8D5EY7Zl0OVdt9LSyvi8F+45GBR3OKt23Xmt8YJW4=;
b=VPLcCcP8Tx+DlvIzJovSKKks/Lob7PugASwbVlkzrnSo2d8p/4D5bY+QHds5STuJA
oMFBgeha0ZNR0BXjfytExpdzv4NXqBENwxQr+4WzyKQGrC+CP9eb9x4DqiaeRtZt9
b1AJYWdspFZp2FdbnG8lcMlmF9IqVim/MUjBagL2I=
Received: from WIN-31JU0TAIRNS (WIN-31JU0TAIRNS [184.105.154.119]) by smtp.vgreports.com with SMTP;
Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
From: Peter Turay<peter.turay@vgreports.com>
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Message-Id: <20160526150103.1084433672@vgreports.com>
Subject: Report - Enterprise Endpoint Cyber Security Market Report 2015-2020
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: peter.turay@vgreports.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="AlternativeBoundary.22222222.22222222"
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<zhorazhorashvili@mail.ru>: host mxs.mail.ru[94.100.180.150] said: 550 Message
was not accepted -- invalid mailbox. Local mailbox
zhorazhorashvili@mail.ru is unavailable: account is disabled (in reply to
end of DATA command)
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net [77.88.29.152])
by forward11p.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6255E20EA2
for <zhorazhorashvili@mail.ru>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:59 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id DERxqqNQ
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:55 +0300
Received: from smtp.vgreports.com (smtp.vgreports.com [65.19.134.171])
by mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id MGfgMU698n-Mp8GBgwB;
Fri, 27 May 2016 05:22:51 +0300
Authentication-Results: mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront1g.mail.yandex.net: domain of vgreports.com designates 65.19.134.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=peter.turay@vgreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@vgreports.com
X-SmarterMail-Authenticated-As: admin@vgreports.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h=received:from:to:message-id:subject:date:mime-version:reply-to
:content-type;
b=QXnN+iZTGWggKpDSF1VNSRB7ISEinRvXOXiSGPea1vf7eZODXPCQWqJK4vWfv0lOo
z0D2a7pysneWt42lZMrww+Xl3Lqn6mH6rEYMBqdMZabgUPvG0LG3uEukd8Udaog9h
WeFhSSRUXwru+JoFofUhwmv5Hi8jFDBWD9i9mu4f0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=vgreports.com; s=smtp;
h= content-type:reply-to:mime-version:date:subject:message-id:to:from;
bh=Lq8D5EY7Zl0OVdt9LSyvi8F+45GBR3OKt23Xmt8YJW4=;
b=VPLcCcP8Tx+DlvIzJovSKKks/Lob7PugASwbVlkzrnSo2d8p/4D5bY+QHds5STuJA
oMFBgeha0ZNR0BXjfytExpdzv4NXqBENwxQr+4WzyKQGrC+CP9eb9x4DqiaeRtZt9
b1AJYWdspFZp2FdbnG8lcMlmF9IqVim/MUjBagL2I=
Received: from WIN-31JU0TAIRNS (WIN-31JU0TAIRNS [184.105.154.119]) by smtp.vgreports.com with SMTP;
Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
From: Peter Turay<peter.turay@vgreports.com>
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Message-Id: <20160526150103.1084433672@vgreports.com>
Subject: Report - Enterprise Endpoint Cyber Security Market Report 2015-2020
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:01:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: peter.turay@vgreports.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="AlternativeBoundary.22222222.22222222"
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<zhorazhorashvili@mail.ru>: host mxs.mail.ru[94.100.180.150] said: 550 Message
was not accepted -- invalid mailbox. Local mailbox
zhorazhorashvili@mail.ru is unavailable: account is disabled (in reply to
end of DATA command)
Недоставленное сообщение
Return-Path: <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.137])
by forward16h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8E3A520DD1
for <bugmenot@asdasd.ru>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:45:09 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id oko7Z32R
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:28 +0300
Received: from mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com (mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com [74.91.85.238])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPS id 52gz1141JE-iQM4gXml;
Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:27 +0300
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(Client certificate not present)
Authentication-Results: mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net: domain of snsreports.com designates 74.91.85.238 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=andy.silva@snsreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@smtp.com
X-MSFBL: eyJiIjoiNzRfOTFfODVfMjM4IiwiciI6ImFsaS5hbGktYW5AeWFuZGV4LmJ5Iiwi
ZyI6IlNuc3RlbGVjb21fZGVkaWNhdGVkX3Bvb2wifQ==
Received: from [192.168.80.22] ([192.168.80.22:50817] helo=rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com)
by rs-ord-mta03-4.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTP
id E2/B4-01785-876A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=smtp.com; s=smtpcomcustomers; c=relaxed/simple;
q=dns/txt; i=@smtp.com; t=1464313464;
h=From:Subject:To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
bh=IlU+H5IIVnzTF6+omBUdb3IDpyYmOJNda7xS/efHFbg=;
b=VWRbBpZWpEaH/ZTJIoxVqvljGho9TTEJP1euRuRgxFaWsnCn9Tlo743c0M9YhMgw
ClN8fpamAbI22kZecZRfngpUcMx3ABIqBVQE6wVo0DzmY9oQB9XEbNZTQP7gT64G
rhYoI4NnrlWoekv36zk+bgHNd55HEC05eHDDrYP0ygA=;
Received: from [70.79.69.78] ([70.79.69.78:53231] helo=S01061c1b689e28c7.vc.shawcable.net)
by rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTPA
id EF/2D-24100-776A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Andy Silva" <andy.silva@snsreports.com>
Reply-To: andy.silva@snsreports.com
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Subject: The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Ecosystem: 2016 - 2030 - Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts (Report)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_656E_61831C12.6E2C07FC"
X-Mailer: Smart_Send_2_0_138
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:44:17 -0700
Message-ID: <9008423989016253322280@Ankur>
X-Report-Abuse: SMTP.com is an email service provider. Our abuse team cares about your feedback. Please contact abuse@smtp.com for further investigation.
X-SMTPCOM-Tracking-Number: 07db5c6a-2f94-4f94-84db-b77f72810377
X-SMTPCOM-Sender-ID: 6008902
Feedback-ID: 6008902:SMTPCOM
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<bugmenot@asdasd.ru>: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=asdasd.ru type=AAAA: Host not found
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.137])
by forward16h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8E3A520DD1
for <bugmenot@asdasd.ru>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:45:09 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id oko7Z32R
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:28 +0300
Received: from mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com (mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com [74.91.85.238])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPS id 52gz1141JE-iQM4gXml;
Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:27 +0300
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(Client certificate not present)
Authentication-Results: mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net: domain of snsreports.com designates 74.91.85.238 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=andy.silva@snsreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@smtp.com
X-MSFBL: eyJiIjoiNzRfOTFfODVfMjM4IiwiciI6ImFsaS5hbGktYW5AeWFuZGV4LmJ5Iiwi
ZyI6IlNuc3RlbGVjb21fZGVkaWNhdGVkX3Bvb2wifQ==
Received: from [192.168.80.22] ([192.168.80.22:50817] helo=rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com)
by rs-ord-mta03-4.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTP
id E2/B4-01785-876A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=smtp.com; s=smtpcomcustomers; c=relaxed/simple;
q=dns/txt; i=@smtp.com; t=1464313464;
h=From:Subject:To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
bh=IlU+H5IIVnzTF6+omBUdb3IDpyYmOJNda7xS/efHFbg=;
b=VWRbBpZWpEaH/ZTJIoxVqvljGho9TTEJP1euRuRgxFaWsnCn9Tlo743c0M9YhMgw
ClN8fpamAbI22kZecZRfngpUcMx3ABIqBVQE6wVo0DzmY9oQB9XEbNZTQP7gT64G
rhYoI4NnrlWoekv36zk+bgHNd55HEC05eHDDrYP0ygA=;
Received: from [70.79.69.78] ([70.79.69.78:53231] helo=S01061c1b689e28c7.vc.shawcable.net)
by rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTPA
id EF/2D-24100-776A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Andy Silva" <andy.silva@snsreports.com>
Reply-To: andy.silva@snsreports.com
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Subject: The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Ecosystem: 2016 - 2030 - Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts (Report)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_656E_61831C12.6E2C07FC"
X-Mailer: Smart_Send_2_0_138
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:44:17 -0700
Message-ID: <9008423989016253322280@Ankur>
X-Report-Abuse: SMTP.com is an email service provider. Our abuse team cares about your feedback. Please contact abuse@smtp.com for further investigation.
X-SMTPCOM-Tracking-Number: 07db5c6a-2f94-4f94-84db-b77f72810377
X-SMTPCOM-Sender-ID: 6008902
Feedback-ID: 6008902:SMTPCOM
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<bugmenot@asdasd.ru>: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=asdasd.ru type=AAAA: Host not found
Недоставленное сообщение
Return-Path: <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.137])
by forward14h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id BD91B21795
for <virginiahhart@gmail.com>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:59 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id oko7Z32R
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:28 +0300
Received: from mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com (mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com [74.91.85.238])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPS id 52gz1141JE-iQM4gXml;
Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:27 +0300
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(Client certificate not present)
Authentication-Results: mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net: domain of snsreports.com designates 74.91.85.238 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=andy.silva@snsreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@smtp.com
X-MSFBL: eyJiIjoiNzRfOTFfODVfMjM4IiwiciI6ImFsaS5hbGktYW5AeWFuZGV4LmJ5Iiwi
ZyI6IlNuc3RlbGVjb21fZGVkaWNhdGVkX3Bvb2wifQ==
Received: from [192.168.80.22] ([192.168.80.22:50817] helo=rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com)
by rs-ord-mta03-4.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTP
id E2/B4-01785-876A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=smtp.com; s=smtpcomcustomers; c=relaxed/simple;
q=dns/txt; i=@smtp.com; t=1464313464;
h=From:Subject:To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
bh=IlU+H5IIVnzTF6+omBUdb3IDpyYmOJNda7xS/efHFbg=;
b=VWRbBpZWpEaH/ZTJIoxVqvljGho9TTEJP1euRuRgxFaWsnCn9Tlo743c0M9YhMgw
ClN8fpamAbI22kZecZRfngpUcMx3ABIqBVQE6wVo0DzmY9oQB9XEbNZTQP7gT64G
rhYoI4NnrlWoekv36zk+bgHNd55HEC05eHDDrYP0ygA=;
Received: from [70.79.69.78] ([70.79.69.78:53231] helo=S01061c1b689e28c7.vc.shawcable.net)
by rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTPA
id EF/2D-24100-776A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Andy Silva" <andy.silva@snsreports.com>
Reply-To: andy.silva@snsreports.com
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Subject: The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Ecosystem: 2016 - 2030 - Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts (Report)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_656E_61831C12.6E2C07FC"
X-Mailer: Smart_Send_2_0_138
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:44:17 -0700
Message-ID: <9008423989016253322280@Ankur>
X-Report-Abuse: SMTP.com is an email service provider. Our abuse team cares about your feedback. Please contact abuse@smtp.com for further investigation.
X-SMTPCOM-Tracking-Number: 07db5c6a-2f94-4f94-84db-b77f72810377
X-SMTPCOM-Sender-ID: 6008902
Feedback-ID: 6008902:SMTPCOM
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<virginiahhart@gmail.com>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.71.26] said:
550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please
try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or
550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6596 m72si9782942lfg.356 - gsmtp (in
reply to RCPT TO command)
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.137])
by forward14h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id BD91B21795
for <virginiahhart@gmail.com>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:59 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id oko7Z32R
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:28 +0300
Received: from mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com (mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com [74.91.85.238])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPS id 52gz1141JE-iQM4gXml;
Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:27 +0300
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(Client certificate not present)
Authentication-Results: mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net: domain of snsreports.com designates 74.91.85.238 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=andy.silva@snsreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@smtp.com
X-MSFBL: eyJiIjoiNzRfOTFfODVfMjM4IiwiciI6ImFsaS5hbGktYW5AeWFuZGV4LmJ5Iiwi
ZyI6IlNuc3RlbGVjb21fZGVkaWNhdGVkX3Bvb2wifQ==
Received: from [192.168.80.22] ([192.168.80.22:50817] helo=rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com)
by rs-ord-mta03-4.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTP
id E2/B4-01785-876A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=smtp.com; s=smtpcomcustomers; c=relaxed/simple;
q=dns/txt; i=@smtp.com; t=1464313464;
h=From:Subject:To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
bh=IlU+H5IIVnzTF6+omBUdb3IDpyYmOJNda7xS/efHFbg=;
b=VWRbBpZWpEaH/ZTJIoxVqvljGho9TTEJP1euRuRgxFaWsnCn9Tlo743c0M9YhMgw
ClN8fpamAbI22kZecZRfngpUcMx3ABIqBVQE6wVo0DzmY9oQB9XEbNZTQP7gT64G
rhYoI4NnrlWoekv36zk+bgHNd55HEC05eHDDrYP0ygA=;
Received: from [70.79.69.78] ([70.79.69.78:53231] helo=S01061c1b689e28c7.vc.shawcable.net)
by rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTPA
id EF/2D-24100-776A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Andy Silva" <andy.silva@snsreports.com>
Reply-To: andy.silva@snsreports.com
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Subject: The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Ecosystem: 2016 - 2030 - Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts (Report)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_656E_61831C12.6E2C07FC"
X-Mailer: Smart_Send_2_0_138
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:44:17 -0700
Message-ID: <9008423989016253322280@Ankur>
X-Report-Abuse: SMTP.com is an email service provider. Our abuse team cares about your feedback. Please contact abuse@smtp.com for further investigation.
X-SMTPCOM-Tracking-Number: 07db5c6a-2f94-4f94-84db-b77f72810377
X-SMTPCOM-Sender-ID: 6008902
Feedback-ID: 6008902:SMTPCOM
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<virginiahhart@gmail.com>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.71.26] said:
550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please
try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or
550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6596 m72si9782942lfg.356 - gsmtp (in
reply to RCPT TO command)
Недоставленное сообщение
Return-Path: <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.137])
by forward17h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 5537721381
for <raybpayne@gmail.com>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:59 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id oko7Z32R
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:28 +0300
Received: from mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com (mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com [74.91.85.238])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPS id 52gz1141JE-iQM4gXml;
Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:27 +0300
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(Client certificate not present)
Authentication-Results: mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net: domain of snsreports.com designates 74.91.85.238 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=andy.silva@snsreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@smtp.com
X-MSFBL: eyJiIjoiNzRfOTFfODVfMjM4IiwiciI6ImFsaS5hbGktYW5AeWFuZGV4LmJ5Iiwi
ZyI6IlNuc3RlbGVjb21fZGVkaWNhdGVkX3Bvb2wifQ==
Received: from [192.168.80.22] ([192.168.80.22:50817] helo=rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com)
by rs-ord-mta03-4.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTP
id E2/B4-01785-876A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=smtp.com; s=smtpcomcustomers; c=relaxed/simple;
q=dns/txt; i=@smtp.com; t=1464313464;
h=From:Subject:To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
bh=IlU+H5IIVnzTF6+omBUdb3IDpyYmOJNda7xS/efHFbg=;
b=VWRbBpZWpEaH/ZTJIoxVqvljGho9TTEJP1euRuRgxFaWsnCn9Tlo743c0M9YhMgw
ClN8fpamAbI22kZecZRfngpUcMx3ABIqBVQE6wVo0DzmY9oQB9XEbNZTQP7gT64G
rhYoI4NnrlWoekv36zk+bgHNd55HEC05eHDDrYP0ygA=;
Received: from [70.79.69.78] ([70.79.69.78:53231] helo=S01061c1b689e28c7.vc.shawcable.net)
by rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTPA
id EF/2D-24100-776A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Andy Silva" <andy.silva@snsreports.com>
Reply-To: andy.silva@snsreports.com
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Subject: The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Ecosystem: 2016 - 2030 - Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts (Report)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_656E_61831C12.6E2C07FC"
X-Mailer: Smart_Send_2_0_138
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:44:17 -0700
Message-ID: <9008423989016253322280@Ankur>
X-Report-Abuse: SMTP.com is an email service provider. Our abuse team cares about your feedback. Please contact abuse@smtp.com for further investigation.
X-SMTPCOM-Tracking-Number: 07db5c6a-2f94-4f94-84db-b77f72810377
X-SMTPCOM-Sender-ID: 6008902
Feedback-ID: 6008902:SMTPCOM
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<raybpayne@gmail.com>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.71.26] said:
550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please
try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or
550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6596 z128si3920090lfa.129 - gsmtp
(in reply to RCPT TO command)
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.137])
by forward17h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 5537721381
for <raybpayne@gmail.com>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:59 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id oko7Z32R
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:28 +0300
Received: from mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com (mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com [74.91.85.238])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPS id 52gz1141JE-iQM4gXml;
Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:27 +0300
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(Client certificate not present)
Authentication-Results: mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net: domain of snsreports.com designates 74.91.85.238 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=andy.silva@snsreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@smtp.com
X-MSFBL: eyJiIjoiNzRfOTFfODVfMjM4IiwiciI6ImFsaS5hbGktYW5AeWFuZGV4LmJ5Iiwi
ZyI6IlNuc3RlbGVjb21fZGVkaWNhdGVkX3Bvb2wifQ==
Received: from [192.168.80.22] ([192.168.80.22:50817] helo=rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com)
by rs-ord-mta03-4.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTP
id E2/B4-01785-876A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=smtp.com; s=smtpcomcustomers; c=relaxed/simple;
q=dns/txt; i=@smtp.com; t=1464313464;
h=From:Subject:To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
bh=IlU+H5IIVnzTF6+omBUdb3IDpyYmOJNda7xS/efHFbg=;
b=VWRbBpZWpEaH/ZTJIoxVqvljGho9TTEJP1euRuRgxFaWsnCn9Tlo743c0M9YhMgw
ClN8fpamAbI22kZecZRfngpUcMx3ABIqBVQE6wVo0DzmY9oQB9XEbNZTQP7gT64G
rhYoI4NnrlWoekv36zk+bgHNd55HEC05eHDDrYP0ygA=;
Received: from [70.79.69.78] ([70.79.69.78:53231] helo=S01061c1b689e28c7.vc.shawcable.net)
by rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTPA
id EF/2D-24100-776A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Andy Silva" <andy.silva@snsreports.com>
Reply-To: andy.silva@snsreports.com
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Subject: The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Ecosystem: 2016 - 2030 - Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts (Report)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_656E_61831C12.6E2C07FC"
X-Mailer: Smart_Send_2_0_138
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:44:17 -0700
Message-ID: <9008423989016253322280@Ankur>
X-Report-Abuse: SMTP.com is an email service provider. Our abuse team cares about your feedback. Please contact abuse@smtp.com for further investigation.
X-SMTPCOM-Tracking-Number: 07db5c6a-2f94-4f94-84db-b77f72810377
X-SMTPCOM-Sender-ID: 6008902
Feedback-ID: 6008902:SMTPCOM
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<raybpayne@gmail.com>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.71.26] said:
550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please
try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or
550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6596 z128si3920090lfa.129 - gsmtp
(in reply to RCPT TO command)
Недоставленное сообщение
Return-Path: <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.137])
by forward7h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7383F21F42
for <zhorazhorashvili@mail.ru>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:33 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id oko7Z32R
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:28 +0300
Received: from mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com (mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com [74.91.85.238])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPS id 52gz1141JE-iQM4gXml;
Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:27 +0300
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(Client certificate not present)
Authentication-Results: mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net: domain of snsreports.com designates 74.91.85.238 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=andy.silva@snsreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@smtp.com
X-MSFBL: eyJiIjoiNzRfOTFfODVfMjM4IiwiciI6ImFsaS5hbGktYW5AeWFuZGV4LmJ5Iiwi
ZyI6IlNuc3RlbGVjb21fZGVkaWNhdGVkX3Bvb2wifQ==
Received: from [192.168.80.22] ([192.168.80.22:50817] helo=rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com)
by rs-ord-mta03-4.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTP
id E2/B4-01785-876A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=smtp.com; s=smtpcomcustomers; c=relaxed/simple;
q=dns/txt; i=@smtp.com; t=1464313464;
h=From:Subject:To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
bh=IlU+H5IIVnzTF6+omBUdb3IDpyYmOJNda7xS/efHFbg=;
b=VWRbBpZWpEaH/ZTJIoxVqvljGho9TTEJP1euRuRgxFaWsnCn9Tlo743c0M9YhMgw
ClN8fpamAbI22kZecZRfngpUcMx3ABIqBVQE6wVo0DzmY9oQB9XEbNZTQP7gT64G
rhYoI4NnrlWoekv36zk+bgHNd55HEC05eHDDrYP0ygA=;
Received: from [70.79.69.78] ([70.79.69.78:53231] helo=S01061c1b689e28c7.vc.shawcable.net)
by rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTPA
id EF/2D-24100-776A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Andy Silva" <andy.silva@snsreports.com>
Reply-To: andy.silva@snsreports.com
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Subject: The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Ecosystem: 2016 - 2030 - Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts (Report)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_656E_61831C12.6E2C07FC"
X-Mailer: Smart_Send_2_0_138
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:44:17 -0700
Message-ID: <9008423989016253322280@Ankur>
X-Report-Abuse: SMTP.com is an email service provider. Our abuse team cares about your feedback. Please contact abuse@smtp.com for further investigation.
X-SMTPCOM-Tracking-Number: 07db5c6a-2f94-4f94-84db-b77f72810377
X-SMTPCOM-Sender-ID: 6008902
Feedback-ID: 6008902:SMTPCOM
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<zhorazhorashvili@mail.ru>: host mxs.mail.ru[217.69.139.150] said: 550 Message
was not accepted -- invalid mailbox. Local mailbox
zhorazhorashvili@mail.ru is unavailable: account is disabled (in reply to
end of DATA command)
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.137])
by forward7h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7383F21F42
for <zhorazhorashvili@mail.ru>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:33 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id oko7Z32R
for <ali.ali-an@yandex.by>; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:28 +0300
Received: from mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com (mailer238.gate85.rs.smtp.com [74.91.85.238])
by mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPS id 52gz1141JE-iQM4gXml;
Fri, 27 May 2016 04:44:27 +0300
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(Client certificate not present)
Authentication-Results: mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net; spf=pass (mxfront5h.mail.yandex.net: domain of snsreports.com designates 74.91.85.238 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=andy.silva@snsreports.com; dkim=pass header.i=@smtp.com
X-MSFBL: eyJiIjoiNzRfOTFfODVfMjM4IiwiciI6ImFsaS5hbGktYW5AeWFuZGV4LmJ5Iiwi
ZyI6IlNuc3RlbGVjb21fZGVkaWNhdGVkX3Bvb2wifQ==
Received: from [192.168.80.22] ([192.168.80.22:50817] helo=rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com)
by rs-ord-mta03-4.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTP
id E2/B4-01785-876A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=smtp.com; s=smtpcomcustomers; c=relaxed/simple;
q=dns/txt; i=@smtp.com; t=1464313464;
h=From:Subject:To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
bh=IlU+H5IIVnzTF6+omBUdb3IDpyYmOJNda7xS/efHFbg=;
b=VWRbBpZWpEaH/ZTJIoxVqvljGho9TTEJP1euRuRgxFaWsnCn9Tlo743c0M9YhMgw
ClN8fpamAbI22kZecZRfngpUcMx3ABIqBVQE6wVo0DzmY9oQB9XEbNZTQP7gT64G
rhYoI4NnrlWoekv36zk+bgHNd55HEC05eHDDrYP0ygA=;
Received: from [70.79.69.78] ([70.79.69.78:53231] helo=S01061c1b689e28c7.vc.shawcable.net)
by rs-ord-mta02-2.smtp.com (envelope-from <andy.silva@snsreports.com>)
(ecelerity 4.1.0.46749 r(Core:4.1.0.4)) with ESMTPA
id EF/2D-24100-776A7475; Fri, 27 May 2016 01:44:24 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Andy Silva" <andy.silva@snsreports.com>
Reply-To: andy.silva@snsreports.com
To: ali.ali-an@yandex.by
Subject: The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Ecosystem: 2016 - 2030 - Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts (Report)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_656E_61831C12.6E2C07FC"
X-Mailer: Smart_Send_2_0_138
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:44:17 -0700
Message-ID: <9008423989016253322280@Ankur>
X-Report-Abuse: SMTP.com is an email service provider. Our abuse team cares about your feedback. Please contact abuse@smtp.com for further investigation.
X-SMTPCOM-Tracking-Number: 07db5c6a-2f94-4f94-84db-b77f72810377
X-SMTPCOM-Sender-ID: 6008902
Feedback-ID: 6008902:SMTPCOM
X-Yandex-Forward: 4d5f734b4dc5e0eef1298172b29bef18
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru.
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может
быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
<zhorazhorashvili@mail.ru>: host mxs.mail.ru[217.69.139.150] said: 550 Message
was not accepted -- invalid mailbox. Local mailbox
zhorazhorashvili@mail.ru is unavailable: account is disabled (in reply to
end of DATA command)
Re: The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Ecosystem: 2016 - 2030 - Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts (Report)
для подтверждения регистрации универсального аккаунта на новом ресурсе перейдите по ссылке http://interport2000.blogspot.ru/
The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Ecosystem: 2016 - 2030 - Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts (Report)
Ordering Process: Please contact Andy Silva on andy.silva@snsreports.com Provide the following information: 1. Report Title - Please contact me if you have any questions, or wish to purchase a copy. Table of contents and List of figures mentioned below for your better inside. I look forward to hearing from you. Kind Regards Andy Silva Marketing Executive Signals and Systems Telecom _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Content 1: Introduction 2: An Overview of SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization 3: SDN & NFV Use Case Scenarios 4: SDN & NFV Deployment Case Studies 5: Industry Roadmap and Value Chain 6: Standardization Bodies & Alliances 7: Company Profiles 8: Market Analysis & Forecasts 9: Conclusion & Strategic Recommendations List of Figures: Figure 1: The NFV Concept Kind Regards Andy Silva To unsubscribe send an email with unsubscribe in the subject line to: remove@snsreports.com
The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Ecosystem: 2016 – 2030 – Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts
Hello Let me offer you the latest SNS Research report to you and your team, "The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Ecosystem: 2016 – 2030 – Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts." Below is the report highlight and if you like I can send you sample pages for your details inside. Our reports are compiled with primary and secondary informations to produce an overall industry outlook. Report Information: Release Date: May 2016 Number of Pages: 447 Number of Tables and Figures: 92 Key Questions Answered: The report provides answers to the following key questions:
How big is the SDN, NFV and network virtualization opportunity? What trends, challenges and barriers are influencing its growth? How is the ecosystem evolving by segment and region? What will the market size be in 2020 and at what rate will it grow? Which regions, submarkets and countries will see the highest percentage of growth? How are service provider led initiatives driving SDN and NFV investments? How does regulation impact the adoption of SDN and NFV centric networks? How can NFV make the VoLTE (Voice over LTE) business case work? How can software defined DPI (Deep Packet Inspection) complement SDN functionality? What level of CapEx savings can SDN and NFV facilitate for service providers? Do SDN and NFV pose a threat to traditional network infrastructure vendors? Who are the key market players and what are their strategies? Is there a ring leader in the SDN and NFV ecosystem? What strategies should enabling technology providers, network infrastructure vendors, mobile operators and other ecosystem players adopt to remain competitive?Key Findings:
The report has the following key findings:
Topics Covered: The report covers the following topics:
Forecast Segmentation: Market forecasts are provided for each of the following submarkets, user base and use case categories:
User Base Categories
Service Providers Enterprises & Data Centers
NFV Submarkets
Hardware Appliances Orchestration & Management Software VNF Software
Service Provider SDN Submarkets
SDN-Enabled Hardware Appliances Orchestration & Management Software SDN Controller Software Network Applications Software
Enterprise & Data Center SDN Submarkets
SDN-Enabled Hardware Appliances SDN-Enabled Virtual Switches SDN Controller Software
Service Provider Use Case Categories
CDNCPE Data Center EPC/Mobile Core Fixed Access Networks IMS & VoLTE Policy, OSS & BSS RAN (Radio Access Network) Transport & Backhaul
Country Markets
Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Pakistan, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, UAE, UK and USAAdditional forecasts are provided for:
SDN and NFV Induced Service Provider CapEx Savings by Region
Report Pricing:Single User License: USD 2,500 Company Wide License: USD 3,500
2. Report License - (Single User/Company Wide)
3. Name -
4. Email -
5. Job Title -
6. Company -
7. Invoice Address -
1.1 Executive Summary
1.2 Topics Covered
1.3 Forecast Segmentation
1.4 Key Questions Answered
1.5 Key Findings
1.6 Methodology
1.7 Target Audience
1.8 Companies & Organizations Mentioned
2.1 What is Network Virtualization?
2.2 What is SDN (Software Defined Networking)?
2.3 SDN Protocols
2.3.1 OpenFlow
2.3.2 BGP-TE (Border Gateway Protocol - Traffic Engineering)
2.3.3 PCEP (Path Computation Element Protocol)
2.3.4 I2RS (Interface to the Routing System)
2.3.5 VxLAN (Virtual Extensible LAN)
2.3.6 ALTO (Application Layer Traffic Optimization)
2.3.7 IETF Software Driven Networks
2.4 SDN Implementation Approaches
2.4.1 Network Virtualization Approach
2.4.2 Evolutionary Approach
2.4.3 The "Central Control" Approach
2.5 What is NFV (Network Functions Virtualization)?
2.6 NFV Enabling Technologies
2.6.1 Cloud Computing and Network Virtualization
2.6.2 Open Management and Control Protocols
2.6.3 Industry Standard High-Volume Servers
2.7 NFV Implementation Architecture
2.7.1 NFVI (NFV Infrastructure)
2.7.1.1 Hardware Resources
2.7.1.2 Virtualized Resources
2.7.2 VNFs (Virtualized Network Functions)
2.7.3 NFV-MANO (NFV-Management and Orchestration)
2.7.3.1 VIM (Virtualized Infrastructure Manager)
2.7.3.2 Orchestrator
2.7.3.3 VNF Manager
2.8 How SDN and NFV Differ from Each Other?
2.8.1 Similarities and Differences
2.8.2 Can Both Technologies Complement Each Other?
2.8.3 How Are Vendors Positioning their Solutions?
2.9 Market Drivers
2.9.1 Leveraging Generic Low-cost Hardware
2.9.2 Multi-tenancy on Same Hardware
2.9.3 Reduced Power Consumption
2.9.4 Faster TTM (Time to Market)
2.9.5 Improved Operational Efficiency & Performance
2.9.6 Centralized Provisioning and Network Control
2.9.7 Ability to Launch New Services & Virtual Networks Quickly
2.9.8 Dynamic Scaling of Services
2.9.9 Opening the Door to Multi-vendor Interoperability
2.9.10 CapEx and OpEx Reduction
2.9.11 Fast Troubleshooting and Improved Diagnostics
2.9.12 Vendor Support
2.10 Market Barriers
2.10.1 Lack of Standardization & Technology Maturity
2.10.2 Uncertain Cost-Benefits Tradeoffs
2.10.3 NFV May Slow/Delay Traffic
2.10.4 Will Multi-vendor Interoperability Really Work?
2.10.5 Co-Existence with Legacy Networks: Integration Challenges
3.1 Enterprise, Data Center & Generic Use Cases
3.1.1 Network Virtualization
3.1.2 Scalable Data Centers
3.1.3 SD-WAN (Software Defined WAN)
3.1.4 Tap Aggregation
3.1.5 Dynamic WAN Re-Routing
3.1.6 Network Exchange: Interconnecting Physical Networks
3.1.7 Improved Traffic Engineering
3.1.8 Converged Storage
3.2 Service Provider Centric Use Cases
3.2.1 RAN Virtualization
3.2.2 C-RAN (Cloud RAN)
3.2.3 Wireline Fixed Access Network Virtualization
3.2.4 CPE & Home Network Environment Virtualization
3.2.5 Mobile Backhaul Virtualization
3.2.6 EPC/Mobile Core Virtualization
3.2.7 IMS & VoLTE Virtualization
3.2.8 DPI Virtualization
3.2.9 Policy Functions Virtualization
3.2.10 Virtual Routers
3.2.11 Virtualization & Control of Security Functions
3.2.12 Virtualization of CDNs
3.2.13 Service Chaining
3.2.14 Bandwidth on Demand
3.2.15 Packet-Optical Integration
3.2.16 SDN/NFV Iaas (Infrastructure as a Service)
3.2.17 VNFaas (Virtual Network Function as a Service)
3.2.18 VNPaaS (Virtual Network Platform as a Service)
4.1 Service Provider Deployment Case Studies
4.1.1 AT&T
4.1.2 BT Group
4.1.3 China Mobile
4.1.4 DT (Deutsche Telekom)
4.1.5 Etisalat
4.1.6 IIJ (Internet Initiative Japan)
4.1.7 KDDI Corporation
4.1.8 KT Corporation
4.1.9 LG Uplus
4.1.10 NAKA Mobile
4.1.11 NTT Communications
4.1.12 NTT DoCoMo
4.1.13 PT (Portugal Telecom) /Oi
4.1.14 SingTel
4.1.15 SK Telecom
4.1.16 SoftBank
4.1.17 Telekom Austria Group
4.1.18 Telstra
4.1.19 Telefónica
4.1.20 Verizon
4.1.21 Vodafone Group
4.2 Enterprise & Data Center Deployment Case Studies
4.2.1 Baidu
4.2.2 Citigroup
4.2.3 City of Avondale
4.2.4 Equinix
4.2.5 Fidelity Investments
4.2.6 Google
4.2.7 Kanazawa University Hospital
4.2.8 Microsoft
4.2.9 Nippon Express
4.2.10 Paddy Power Betfair
4.2.11 Produban
4.2.12 Shutterfly
4.2.13 U2 Cloud
4.2.14 UBM Tech
5.1 The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Value Chain
5.1.1 Silicon & Server OEMs
5.1.2 Pure-play SDN/NFV Specialists
5.1.3 Network Infrastructure Vendors
5.1.4 IT Industry Giants
5.1.5 Mobile Infrastructure Vendors
5.1.6 Policy, OSS, BSS & Other Software Vendors
5.1.7 Enterprises
5.1.8 Service Providers
5.1.9 Data Center Operators
5.2 The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Industry Roadmap: 2016 - 2030
5.2.1 2016 - 2020: Moving Towards Network Wide Orchestration
5.2.2 2020 - 2025: Large Scale Proliferation in Service Provider Networks
5.2.3 2025 - 2030: Continued Investments with 5G Rollouts
6.1 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project)
6.2 ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute)
6.3 Cloud NFV
6.4 IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force)
6.5 IRTF (Internet Research Task Force)
6.6 ITU (International Telecommunications Union)
6.7 MEF (Metro Ethernet Forum)
6.8 ONF (Open Networking Foundation)
6.9 OpenDaylight
6.10 OpenStack Foundation
6.11 ONRC (Open Networking Research Center) and ON.Lab (Open Networking Lab)
6.12 OPNFV (Open Platform for NFV)
6.13 OVA (Open Virtualization Alliance)
6.14 OMG (Object Management Group)
6.15 TM Forum
6.16 Vendor Led Initiatives & Ecosystem Programs
6.16.1 Nokia CloudBand Ecosystem Program
6.16.2 Ciena Blue Orbit Ecosystem
6.16.3 HP OpenNFV Application Partner Program
6.16.4 HP SDN Ecosystem Alliance
6.16.5 NEC SDN Partner Space
6.16.6 Intel Network Builders Program
6.16.7 Titanium Cloud Partner Program
6.16.8 Juniper Technology Partner Program
6.16.9 Red Hat NFV Ecosystem
6.16.10 Amdocs Network Cloud Ecosystem
7.1 6WIND
7.2 A10 Networks
7.3 Accedian Networks
7.4 Accton Technology Corporation
7.5 Active Broadband Networks
7.6 Actus Networks
7.7 ADARA Networks
7.8 Adax
7.9 ADLINK Technology
7.10 ADTRAN
7.11 ADVA Optical Networking
7.12 Affirmed Networks
7.13 Agema Systems
7.14 Akamai Technologies
7.15 ALAXALA Networks Corporation
7.16 Albis Technologies
7.17 Allied Telesis
7.18 Allot Communications
7.19 Alpha Networks
7.20 ALTEN Calsoft Labs
7.21 Altiostar Networks
7.22 Alvarion Technologies
7.23 AMD (Advanced Micro Devices)
7.24 Amdocs
7.25 ANEVIA
7.26 Argela
7.27 Aricent
7.28 Arista Networks
7.29 Arkoon Netasq
7.30 ARM Holdings
7.31 ARRIS Group
7.32 Artesyn Embedded Technologies
7.33 ASOCS
7.34 Astellia
7.35 AudioCodes
7.36 Avaya
7.37 Barracuda Networks
7.38 Big Switch Networks
7.39 BlueCoat
7.40 Brain4Net
7.41 Broadcom
7.42 Broadpeak
7.43 BroadSoft
7.44 Brocade
7.45 BTI Systems
7.46 Canoga Perkins
7.47 Canonical
7.48 Catbird Networks
7.49 Cavium
7.50 Cedexis
7.51 Cellwize
7.52 Centec Networks
7.53 Ceragon Networks
7.54 Certes Networks
7.55 Check Point Software Technologies
7.56 Ciena Corporation
7.57 Cisco Systems
7.58 Citrix Systems
7.59 Clavister
7.60 ClearPath Networks
7.61 CloudWeaver
7.62 Cobham Wireless
7.63 Cohesive Networks
7.64 Colt Technology Services Group
7.65 Comodo Security Solutions
7.66 Compass-EOS
7.67 Comptel
7.68 Concurrent
7.69 Coriant
7.70 Corsa Technology
7.71 CSC (Computer Sciences Corporation)
7.72 Cumulus Networks
7.73 Dell
7.74 Dialogic
7.75 Docker
7.76 Dorado Software
7.77 ECI Telecom
7.78 Edgeware
7.79 Ekinops
7.80 Elemental Technologies
7.81 EMC Corporation
7.82 EnterpriseWeb
7.83 Ericsson
7.84 EXFO
7.85 Extreme Networks
7.86 F5 Networks
7.87 FibroLAN
7.88 Flash Networks
7.89 Flextronics International
7.90 Fortinet
7.91 FRAFOS
7.92 Fujitsu
7.93 GENBAND
7.94 Gencore Systems
7.95 Gigamon
7.96 GigaSpaces Technologies
7.97 Guavus
7.98 H3C Technologies
7.99 Harmonic
7.100 Hitachi
7.101 HP (Hewlett-Packard)
7.102 Huawei
7.103 HyTrust
7.104 IBM
7.105 Illumio
7.106 Imagine Communications Corporation
7.107 Infinera
7.108 Infoblox
7.109 Inocybe Technologies
7.110 Intel Corporation
7.111 Interface Masters Technologies
7.112 Intracom Telecom
7.113 Intune Networks
7.114 IP Infusion
7.115 IPgallery
7.116 iPhotonix
7.117 IPITEK
7.118 Italtel
7.119 iwNetworks
7.120 Ixia
7.121 Juniper
7.122 KEMP Technologies
7.123 Lemko Corporation
7.124 Lenovo
7.125 Lumeta Corporation
7.126 Luxoft Holding
7.127 Maipu Communication Technology
7.128 Marvell Technology Group
7.129 MatrixStream Technologies
7.130 MediaTek
7.131 Mellanox Technologies
7.132 Metaswitch Networks
7.133 Microsoft
7.134 Midokura
7.135 Mirantis
7.136 Mitel Networks Corporation
7.137 Mojatatu Networks
7.138 MRV Communications
7.139 Nakina Systems
7.140 Napatech
7.141 NCLC (NCL Communication)
7.142 NEC Corporation
7.143 NetCracker Technology
7.144 NETGEAR
7.145 Netronome
7.146 Netrounds
7.147 NetScout Systems
7.148 NetYCE
7.149 NFVWare
7.150 Nokia Networks
7.151 Nominum
7.152 NoviFlow
7.153 NTT Communications
7.154 NXP Semiconductors
7.155 Omnitron Systems
7.156 Openet
7.157 Openwave Mobility
7.158 Opera Software
7.159 Optelian
7.160 Oracle Corporation
7.161 Orchestral networks
7.162 Overture Networks
7.163 OX (Open-Xchange)
7.164 Ozono Security
7.165 Packet Ship Technologies
7.166 Padtec
7.167 Parallel Wireless
7.168 Palo Alto Networks
7.169 Panda Security
7.170 Pantheon Technologies
7.171 PeerApp
7.172 Penguin
7.173 Pertino
7.174 Pica8
7.175 Plexxi
7.176 PLUMgrid
7.177 Pluribus Networks
7.178 Polatis
7.179 Procera Networks
7.180 Qosmos
7.181 Qualcomm
7.182 Quanta Computer
7.183 Quortus
7.184 Rackspace
7.185 RAD Data Communications
7.186 Radisys Corporation
7.187 Radware
7.188 Rapid7
7.189 Realtek Semiconductor Corporation
7.190 Red Hat
7.191 Redknee
7.192 RightScale
7.193 Riverbed Technology
7.194 Ruckus Wireless
7.195 Saisei
7.196 Samsung Electronics
7.197 Sandvine
7.198 Sansay
7.199 Sencore
7.200 SevOne
7.201 Silver Peak Systems
7.202 Sonus Networks
7.203 Sophos
7.204 Sorrento Networks
7.205 SpiderCloud Wireless
7.206 Spirent Communications
7.207 StackIQ
7.208 SunTec Business Solutions
7.209 Supermicro (Super Micro Computer)
7.210 Svarog Technology Group
7.211 Symantec Corporation
7.212 SysMaster
7.213 Tango Telecom
7.214 TE Connectivity
7.215 Tejas Networks
7.216 Telchemy
7.217 Telco Systems
7.218 Telcoware
7.219 Telum
7.220 Thomson Video Networks
7.221 TI (Texas Instruments)
7.222 Tieto
7.223 TitanHQ
7.224 Trend Micro
7.225 UBIqube
7.226 Ultra Electronics AEP
7.227 UTStarcom
7.228 vArmour
7.229 Versa Networks
7.230 Veryx Technologies
7.231 Viavi Solutions
7.232 VMware
7.233 WatchGuard Technologies
7.234 Wavenet
7.235 WebNMS
7.236 Wedge Networks
7.237 Wipro
7.238 Wowza Media Systems
7.239 Xilinx
7.240 XOR Media
7.241 Xtera Communications
7.242 Xura
7.243 Zhone Technologies
7.244 ZTE
8.1 Global Outlook of SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030
8.2 User Base Segmentation
8.2.1 Enterprises & Data Centers
8.2.2 Service Providers
8.3 Submarket Segmentation
8.3.1 SDN Hardware & Software
8.3.2 NFV Hardware & Software
8.3.3 Other Network Virtualization Software
8.3.4 Service Provider Submarket Segmentation
8.4 SDN Submarket Revenue: 2016 - 2030
8.4.1 User Base Segmentation
8.4.2 Service Provider SDN
8.4.3 Enterprise & Data Center SDN
8.5 NFV Submarket Revenue: 2016 - 2030
8.5.1 Hardware Appliances
8.5.2 Orchestration & Management Software
8.5.3 VNF Software
8.6 Service Provider SDN Submarket Revenue: 2016 - 2030
8.6.1 SDN-Enabled Hardware Appliances
8.6.2 Orchestration & Management Software
8.6.3 SDN Controller Software
8.6.4 Network Applications Software
8.7 Enterprise & Data Center SDN Submarket Revenue: 2016 - 2030
8.7.1 SDN-Enabled Hardware Appliances
8.7.2 SDN-Enabled Virtual Switches
8.7.3 SDN Controller Software
8.8 Functional Area Segmentation for Service Provider Deployments
8.8.1 CDN
8.8.2 CPE
8.8.3 Data Center
8.8.4 EPC/Mobile Core
8.8.5 Fixed Access Networks
8.8.6 IMS & VoLTE
8.8.7 Policy, OSS & BSS
8.8.8 RAN
8.8.9 Transport & Backhaul
8.9 Regional Outlook
8.10 Asia Pacific SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030
8.10.1 Australia
8.10.2 China
8.10.3 India
8.10.4 Japan
8.10.5 South Korea
8.10.6 Pakistan
8.10.7 Thailand
8.10.8 Indonesia
8.10.9 Malaysia
8.10.10 Taiwan
8.10.11 Philippines
8.10.12 Singapore
8.10.13 Rest of Asia Pacific
8.11 Eastern Europe SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030
8.11.1 Czech Republic
8.11.2 Poland
8.11.3 Russia
8.11.4 Rest of Eastern Europe
8.12 Latin & Central America SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030
8.12.1 Argentina
8.12.2 Brazil
8.12.3 Mexico
8.12.4 Rest of Latin & Central America
8.13 Middle East & Africa SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030
8.13.1 South Africa
8.13.2 UAE
8.13.3 Qatar
8.13.4 Saudi Arabia
8.13.5 Israel
8.13.6 Rest of the Middle East & Africa
8.14 North America SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030
8.14.1 USA
8.14.2 Canada
8.15 Western Europe SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030
8.15.1 Denmark
8.15.2 Finland
8.15.3 France
8.15.4 Germany
8.15.5 Italy
8.15.6 Spain
8.15.7 Sweden
8.15.8 Norway
8.15.9 UK
8.15.10 Rest of Western Europe
9.1 Will SDN & NFV Disrupt the Network Infrastructure Value Chain?
9.2 Is There a Ring Leader in the SDN & NFV Ecosystem?
9.3 SDN & NFV: Building the Mobile Cloud
9.4 Buyers Will Maintain Focus on Business Agility & CapEx Reduction
9.5 Avoiding the Proprietary Trap
9.6 Will Service Providers Continue to Utilize Proprietary Hardware Platforms?
9.7 Making the VoLTE Business Case Work
9.8 Growing Adoption of vEPC (Virtualized EPC) Platforms
9.9 How Much CapEx Can Service Providers Save with SDN & NFV Investments?
9.1 Prospects of SDN & NFV Orchestration
9.10.1 Different Vendors, Different Approaches
9.10.2 Future Prospects of Harmonization
9.11 Strategic Recommendations
9.11.1 Recommendations for Silicon & Server OEMs
9.11.2 Recommendations for Network & Mobile Infrastructure Vendors & IT Giants
9.11.3 Recommendations for Pure-play SDN/NFV Specialists
9.11.4 Recommendations for Enterprises and Data Center Operators
9.11.5 Recommendations for Service Providers
Figure 2: A Comparison of SDN and NFV
Figure 3: C-RAN Architecture
Figure 4: Virtualized and Non-Virtualized Mobile Core Networks
Figure 5: China Mobile's NovoNet NFV/SDN Program
Figure 6: SK Telecom's vRAN (Virtualized Radio Access Network) Vision
Figure 7: The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Value Chain
Figure 8: The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Industry Roadmap: 2016 - 2030
Figure 9: Global SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 10: Global SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue by User Base: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 11: Global Enterprise & Data Center SDN & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 12: Global Service Provider SDN & NFV Revenue by User Base: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 13: Global SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue by Submarket: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 14: Global SDN Hardware & Software Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 15: Global NFV Hardware & Software Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 16: Global Other Network Virtualization Software Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 17: Global Service Provider SDN & NFV Revenue by Submarket: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 18: Global SDN Revenue by User Base: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 19: Global Service Provider SDN Hardware & Software Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 20: Global Enterprise & Data Center SDN Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 21: Global NFV Revenue by Submarket: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 22: Global NFV Hardware Appliance Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 23: Global NFV Orchestration & Management Software Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 24: Global NFV VNF Software Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 25: Global Service Provider SDN Revenue by Submarket: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 26: Global Service Provider SDN-Enabled Hardware Appliance Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 27: Global Service Provider SDN Orchestration & Management Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 28: Global Service Provider SDN Controller Software Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 29: Global Service Provider SDN Network Applications Software Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 30: Global Enterprise & Data Center SDN Revenue by Submarket: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 31: Global Enterprise & Data Center SDN-Enabled Hardware Appliance Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 32: Global Enterprise & Data Center SDN-Enabled Virtual Switch Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 33: Global Enterprise & Data Center SDN Controller Software Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 34: Global Service Provider SDN & NFV Revenue by Functional Area: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 35: Global SDN & NFV Revenue in Service Provider CDNs: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 36: Global SDN & NFV Revenue in Service Provider CPE Deployments: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 37: Global SDN & NFV Revenue in Service Provider Data Centers: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 38: Global SDN & NFV Revenue in Service Provider EPC/Mobile Core Networks: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 39: Global SDN & NFV Revenue in Service Provider Fixed Access Networks: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 40: Global SDN & NFV Revenue in Service Provider IMS & VoLTE Networks: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 41: Global SDN & NFV Revenue in Service Provider Policy, OSS & BSS Systems: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 42: Global SDN & NFV Revenue in Service Provider RANs: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 43: Global SDN & NFV Revenue in Service Provider Transport & Backhaul Networks: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 44: SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue by Region: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 45: Asia Pacific SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 46: Australia SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 47: China SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 48: India SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 49: Japan SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 50: South Korea SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 51: Pakistan SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 52: Thailand SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 53: Indonesia SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 54: Malaysia SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 55: Taiwan SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 56: Philippines SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 57: Singapore SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 58: SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue in the Rest of Asia Pacific: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 59: Eastern Europe SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 60: Czech Republic SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 61: Poland SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 62: Russia SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 63: SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue in the Rest of Eastern Europe: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 64: Latin & Central America SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 65: Argentina SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 66: Brazil SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 67: Mexico SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 68: SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue in the Rest of Latin & Central America: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 69: Middle East & Africa SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 70: South Africa SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 71: UAE SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 72: Qatar SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 73: Saudi Arabia SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 74: Israel SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 75: SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue in the Rest of the Middle East & Africa: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 76: North America SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 77: USA SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 78: Canada SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 79: Western Europe SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 80: Denmark SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 81: Finland SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 82: France SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 83: Germany SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 84: Italy SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 85: Spain SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 86: Sweden SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 87: Norway SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 88: UK SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 89: SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Revenue in the Rest of Western Europe: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 90: Virtualized vs. Non-Virtualized EPC Investments: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 91: SDN & NFV Induced Service Provider CapEx Saving Potential by Region: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Figure 92: Management & Orchestration Software Revenue by Submarket: 2016 - 2030 ($ Million)
Marketing Executive
Signals and Systems Telecom
andy.silva@snsreports.com
Подписаться на:
Сообщения (Atom)